eneller/osk.rs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update values

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
lukasadrion
2026-02-06 13:46:05 +01:00
parent d38c62c381
commit 4ddaf78137
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/report.Rnw
View File

@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ To examine the effect of keyboard layout on typing performance, repeated-measure
\subsubsection{Typing speed (WPM)} \subsubsection{Typing speed (WPM)}
The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of layout on typing speed, $F(2, 22) = 106.30, p < .001$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_wpm}). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction indicated that QWERTY yielded significantly higher typing speeds than both DVORAK ($p < .001$) and CIRCLE ($p < .001$). The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of layout on typing speed, $F(2, 22) = 120.56, p < .001$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_wpm}). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction indicated that QWERTY yielded significantly higher typing speeds than both DVORAK ($p < .001$) and CIRCLE ($p < .001$).
%Anova RM for WPM %Anova RM for WPM
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ kable(wpm_effect,
\end{table} \end{table}
\subsubsection{Total Error Rate (TER)} \subsubsection{Total Error Rate (TER)}
In contrast, the ANOVA for total error rate did not reveal a significant effect of layout, $F(2, 22) = 0.43, p = 0.657$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_ter}). This indicates that accuracy was comparable across QWERTY, DVORAK, and CIRCLE layouts. Although QWERTY exhibited a slightly higher mean TER than the other layouts, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, while QWERTY facilitated faster typing, it did not compromise accuracy. In contrast, the ANOVA for total error rate did not reveal a significant effect of layout, $F(2, 22) = 0.71, p = 0.505$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_ter}). This indicates that accuracy was comparable across QWERTY, DVORAK, and CIRCLE layouts. Although QWERTY exhibited a slightly higher mean TER than the other layouts, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, while QWERTY facilitated faster typing, it did not compromise accuracy.
%Anova RM for TER %Anova RM for TER
<<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>= <<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>=