update values

This commit is contained in:
lukasadrion
2026-02-06 13:46:05 +01:00
parent d38c62c381
commit 4ddaf78137

View File

@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ To examine the effect of keyboard layout on typing performance, repeated-measure
\subsubsection{Typing speed (WPM)}
The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of layout on typing speed, $F(2, 22) = 106.30, p < .001$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_wpm}). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction indicated that QWERTY yielded significantly higher typing speeds than both DVORAK ($p < .001$) and CIRCLE ($p < .001$).
The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of layout on typing speed, $F(2, 22) = 120.56, p < .001$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_wpm}). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction indicated that QWERTY yielded significantly higher typing speeds than both DVORAK ($p < .001$) and CIRCLE ($p < .001$).
%Anova RM for WPM
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ kable(wpm_effect,
\end{table}
\subsubsection{Total Error Rate (TER)}
In contrast, the ANOVA for total error rate did not reveal a significant effect of layout, $F(2, 22) = 0.43, p = 0.657$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_ter}). This indicates that accuracy was comparable across QWERTY, DVORAK, and CIRCLE layouts. Although QWERTY exhibited a slightly higher mean TER than the other layouts, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, while QWERTY facilitated faster typing, it did not compromise accuracy.
In contrast, the ANOVA for total error rate did not reveal a significant effect of layout, $F(2, 22) = 0.71, p = 0.505$ (Table~\ref{tab:anova_ter}). This indicates that accuracy was comparable across QWERTY, DVORAK, and CIRCLE layouts. Although QWERTY exhibited a slightly higher mean TER than the other layouts, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, while QWERTY facilitated faster typing, it did not compromise accuracy.
%Anova RM for TER
<<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>=