eneller/osk.rs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

minor fixes

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
eneller
2026-02-06 09:39:58 +01:00
parent 03c40a3a96
commit 3c1cb5f9c7
2 changed files with 788 additions and 467 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1229
doc/renv.lock
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

26
doc/report.Rnw
View File

@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ Three on-screen keyboard layouts were evaluated in this study: QWERTY, Dvorak, a
1. QWERTY: The standard layout commonly used in English typing, serving as a baseline for comparison. 1. QWERTY: The standard layout commonly used in English typing, serving as a baseline for comparison.
2. Dvorak: An alternative layout designed to increase typing efficiency by placing frequently used letters in more accessible positions. 2. Dvorak: An alternative layout designed to increase typing efficiency for physical keyboards
by placing frequently used letters in the home row, minimizing finger movements.
3. Circle Layout: A custom layout developed for this study, in which keys were arranged in a circular pattern. Letters that occur more frequently in English were positioned closer to the center and rendered larger to facilitate faster access. Less frequently used letters were placed toward the periphery and sized smaller, aiming to optimize ergonomic reach and visual salience. 3. Circle Layout: A custom layout developed for this study, in which keys were arranged in a circular pattern. Letters that occur more frequently in English were positioned closer to the center and rendered larger to facilitate faster access. Less frequently used letters were placed toward the periphery and sized smaller, aiming to optimize ergonomic reach and visual salience.
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ This design allowed us to investigate both established and novel layouts, compar
\subsubsection{Objective Measures}\label{objective-measures} \subsubsection{Objective Measures}\label{objective-measures}
<<echo=FALSE>>= <<echo=FALSE, message=FALSE>>=
library(knitr) library(knitr)
# Read the results CSV # Read the results CSV
@@ -74,21 +75,20 @@ wpm <- summary(results[, c("qwerty_wpm", "dvorak_wpm", "circle_wpm")])
% TER table % TER table
\begin{table}[H] \begin{table}[H]
\centering \centering
\scriptsize \caption{Summary of Total Error Rate (TER)}
<<results='asis', echo=FALSE>>= <<results='asis', echo=FALSE>>=
kable(ter, format="latex", booktabs=TRUE) kable(ter, format="latex", booktabs=TRUE)
@ @
\caption{Summary of Total Error Rate (TER)}
\end{table} \end{table}
% WPM table % WPM table
\begin{table}[H] \begin{table}[H]
\centering \centering
\scriptsize \caption{Summary of Words per Minute (WPM)}
<<results='asis', echo=FALSE>>= <<results='asis', echo=FALSE>>=
kable(wpm, format="latex", booktabs=TRUE) kable(wpm, format="latex", booktabs=TRUE)
@ @
\caption{Summary of Words per Minute (WPM)}
\end{table} \end{table}
<<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>= <<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>=
@@ -198,15 +198,14 @@ dev.off()
\end{figure} \end{figure}
\subsection{Inferential Statistics}\label{inferential-statistics} \subsection{Inferential Statistics}\label{inferential-statistics}
Independent var: Independent var: Keyboard type
- QWERTY
- DVORAK
- Circle
Dependent var: Dependent var:
- WPM \begin{itemize}
- TER \item WPM
- Nasa-TLX \item TER
\item NASA-TLX
\end{itemize}
%Anova RM for WPM %Anova RM for WPM
<<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>= <<echo=FALSE, results='hide'>>=
@@ -236,7 +235,6 @@ anova_wpm <- aov(wpm ~ layout + Error(id/layout), data=wpm_long)
@ @
Anova WPM results: Anova WPM results:
<<results='asis', echo=FALSE>>= <<results='asis', echo=FALSE>>=
library(knitr)
wpm_tab <- summary(anova_wpm)[[2]][[1]] wpm_tab <- summary(anova_wpm)[[2]][[1]]
wpm_effect <- wpm_tab["layout", , drop=FALSE] wpm_effect <- wpm_tab["layout", , drop=FALSE]